A Comparative Study of Two Centrifugal Concentrators

Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
A. R. Laplante
Organization:
Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
Pages:
12
File Size:
1900 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1993

Abstract

In this paper, the performance of the Knelson Concentrator and of the batch and continuous Falcon Concentrators are compared. The units are based on different operating principles, and perform quite differently. The Knelson yields very high free gold recoveries over a wide size range of both the recovered and rejected species. It is less effective in recovering very fine (<15 μm) or very flaky gold, as encountered in flotation feeds, concentrates or tails. It is the preferred unit for gold recovery from grinding circuits. The batch Falcon is effective in the fine range, typically less than 37 μm for gold. Its recovery zone is quickly saturated when there is significant heavies in the feed. It works best as a pre-concentration unit, or when sulphide content is low. The continuous Falcon is a versatile unit which is capable of recovering fine heavies (density down to 5 g/cm 3), especially from coarser gangue.
Citation

APA: A. R. Laplante  (1993)  A Comparative Study of Two Centrifugal Concentrators

MLA: A. R. Laplante A Comparative Study of Two Centrifugal Concentrators . Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 1993.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account