Cationic Flotation Of Oxides And Silicates

The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Ross W. Smith Salim Akhtar
Organization:
The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Pages:
30
File Size:
612 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1976

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Flotation of oxide minerals, particularly silicates, with cationic collectors differs substantially from classic flotation of sulfide minerals using sulfhydryl collectors. In the case of cationic flotation of these minerals, in general: 1. There is a greater importance of electrostatic interaction between mineral and collector. 2. Longer-chained collectors are required; as a rule at least 10 carbons must be present in the hydrocarbon chain. 3. Moderate concentration of collector is required. 4. Attachment between collector and mineral appears to be less strong even though the system may exhibit a large contact angle. 5. Required conditioning time before flotation is usually relatively short. 6. There is sensitivity to slimes. 7. The collectors usually possess frothing power. 8. Selectivity of cationic collectors for specific minerals is usually poor. Almost any of the oxide and silicate minerals may be floated using cationic collectors. However, specific response to these collectors varies with mineral type. The following classes and minerals are
Citation

APA: Ross W. Smith Salim Akhtar  (1976)  Cationic Flotation Of Oxides And Silicates

MLA: Ross W. Smith Salim Akhtar Cationic Flotation Of Oxides And Silicates. The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1976.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account