Comparing EIA And ESHIA For Evaluating Mining Projects

- Organization:
- Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
- Pages:
- 6
- File Size:
- 86 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 2012
Abstract
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is the accepted method for evaluating proposed mining and other industrial projects to obtain regulatory approval and to help companies plan for responsible development. Another evaluation system becoming increasingly more common for proposed projects is the Environmental, Social and Health Impact Assessment (ESHIA). An ESHIA differs from an EIA for its more comprehensive and inclusive approach to evaluate potential impacts on public health, and its ecosystem services approach to assessing biodiversity impacts. An ESHIA may also be required by certain lenders for financing major projects. Conducting an ESHIA for a proposed mining development is not without its challenges, with costs, scheduling, regulatory concordance and other constraints to be considered. This paper examines some benefits and challenges of ESHIAs and summarizes lessons learned using a case study approach.
Citation
APA:
(2012) Comparing EIA And ESHIA For Evaluating Mining ProjectsMLA: Comparing EIA And ESHIA For Evaluating Mining Projects. Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 2012.