Comparison of Electrode Arrays in IP Surveying

The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
John S. Sumner
Organization:
The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Pages:
6
File Size:
350 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1973

Abstract

The various electrode arrangements used in induced polarization (IP) surveying can be classified according to the geometry of the electric field being measured. The simplest geometry (Wenner, Schlumberger, gradient) is the parallel or plane-wave electric field, while the three-array and pole-dipole array measure the field about a point current electrode. In the dipole-dipole array the characteristics of a dipolar field are approximately measured. The drill hole arrays employ variations of these fundamental geometries, depending on the objectives of the survey. This report compares the relative advantages and disadvantages of each of the commonly used surface and drill hole IP electrode arrays. Factors of each array that are considered are signal-to-noise ratio, EM coupling rejection, speed and cost, and resolution of polarizable bodies. It is concluded that certain arrays are better suited for different exploration objectives and for different geological conditions. Also the type and capabilities of the IP surveying equipment and method limit the choice of arrays.
Citation

APA: John S. Sumner  (1973)  Comparison of Electrode Arrays in IP Surveying

MLA: John S. Sumner Comparison of Electrode Arrays in IP Surveying. The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1973.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account