Cone Penetration Testing Can Save Money (and Trouble)

Deep Foundations Institute
Rob van Dorp
Organization:
Deep Foundations Institute
Pages:
5
File Size:
2037 KB
Publication Date:
May 1, 2022

Abstract

Most traditional foundation designs are based on soil investigations using Standard Penetration Testing (SPT), sometimes combined with static load testing on sacrificial trial piles. However, this design approach has two major shortcomings. First, SPT data do not provide direct and continuous informa- tion about soil resistance as a function of depth. Second and more important, because of the relatively wide spacing between borehole locations, SPT soil investigations do not provide adequate information about variability of soil profile and/or soil resistance over the project area. Preliminary pile load testing on an SPT location can compen- sate for the first disadvantage but cannot address the second disadvantage. A design approach based on an adequate soil investigation campaign with Cone
Citation

APA: Rob van Dorp  (2022)  Cone Penetration Testing Can Save Money (and Trouble)

MLA: Rob van Dorp Cone Penetration Testing Can Save Money (and Trouble). Deep Foundations Institute, 2022.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account