Discussion ? The Design Of Tunnel Support In Deep Hard-Rock Mines Under Quasistatic Conditions - Speers, C. R., Spearing, A. J. S.

- Organization:
- The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
- Pages:
- 8
- File Size:
- 2132 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 1996
Abstract
Contribution by W.D. Ortlepp In the Journal of May 1994, the authors first presented the concept and analysis that formed the basis for a design approach for deep tunnels, now expressed more explicitly in the present paper (March/April 1996). In a contribution in the Journal of March/April 1995, I expressed a certain disquiet about the validity of their original approach. The authors responded to these criticisms in the same issue. It is apparent to me now that both the contribution and its rebuttals were written, probably for different reasons, in such an obscure and pedantic way as to further confuse the reader rather than provide enlightenment. My concern still persists. But in order to avoid further confusion I will attempt to pose my uncertainties and difficulties in a much more direct way. On page 98 (top of 2nd column) in the earlier paper, an important statement concluded as follows: '. . . the horizontal ellipse requires 140 per cent less force for equivalent stability'.
Citation
APA: (1996) Discussion ? The Design Of Tunnel Support In Deep Hard-Rock Mines Under Quasistatic Conditions - Speers, C. R., Spearing, A. J. S.
MLA: Discussion ? The Design Of Tunnel Support In Deep Hard-Rock Mines Under Quasistatic Conditions - Speers, C. R., Spearing, A. J. S.. The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 1996.