Evaluating the Tradeoffs Between Microtunnelling and Tunnel Boring Machines for Small Diameter Tunnels—A Case Study of the Ferry Road and Riverbend Combined Sewer Relief Project - RETC2023

- Organization:
- Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
- Pages:
- 11
- File Size:
- 111 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jun 13, 2023
Abstract
Evaluating and selecting the appropriate excavation method is a key to the success
of any tunnelling project. The benefits and risks of different methods should be well
understood by the designer and communicated to the project owner to enable selection
of a preferred method from a technical, social and environmental impact, cost and
constructability perspective.
For tunnels that have an internal diameter around 3 m, depending on the tunnel purpose
and ground conditions, both microtunnelling with pipe jacking and tunnel boring
machine excavation with a one- or two-pass lining may be feasible construction methods.
Using the Ferry Road and Riverbend Combined Sewer Relief Project located in
Winnipeg, MB as a case study, this paper will discuss the benefits and drawbacks of
each method, including technical design, social, environmental, cost, schedule, and
risk considerations.
Citation
APA:
(2023) Evaluating the Tradeoffs Between Microtunnelling and Tunnel Boring Machines for Small Diameter Tunnels—A Case Study of the Ferry Road and Riverbend Combined Sewer Relief Project - RETC2023MLA: Evaluating the Tradeoffs Between Microtunnelling and Tunnel Boring Machines for Small Diameter Tunnels—A Case Study of the Ferry Road and Riverbend Combined Sewer Relief Project - RETC2023 . Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 2023.