Factors influencing autonomously generated 3D geophysical spatial models APCOM 2021

The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
M. Balamurali A. Melkumyan J. Zigman
Organization:
The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
Pages:
12
File Size:
1805 KB
Publication Date:
Sep 1, 2021

Abstract

Understanding the contribution of geophysical variables is vital for identifying ore indicator regions. Both magnetometry and gamma-rays are used to identify the geophysical signatures of the rocks. Density is another key variable for tonnage estimation in mining, and needs to be re-estimated in areas of change when a boundary update has been conducted. Modelling these geophysical variables in 3D will enable investigation of the properties of the rocks and improve our understanding of the ore. The Gaussian Process (GP) was previously used to generate 3D spatial models for grade estimation using geochemical assays. This study investigates the influence of the following two factors on the GP-based autonomously generated 3D geophysical models: the resolution of the input data, and the number of nearest samples used in the training process. A case study conducted on a typical Hammersley Ranges iron ore deposit using geophysical logs, including density, collected from the exploration holes, is examined in this paper.
Citation

APA: M. Balamurali A. Melkumyan J. Zigman  (2021)  Factors influencing autonomously generated 3D geophysical spatial models APCOM 2021

MLA: M. Balamurali A. Melkumyan J. Zigman Factors influencing autonomously generated 3D geophysical spatial models APCOM 2021. The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 2021.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account