Filtration Vs Counter Current Decantation - A Comparison

The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
K. D. Hester A. C. Anderson
Organization:
The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Pages:
39
File Size:
887 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1973

Abstract

The Elliot Lake uranium deposits are contained in a pebble conglomerate which is similar throughout the basin. This paper compares the solid-liquid separation circuits of two nominal 3000 T/d acid leach uranium concentrates treating Elliot Lake ore. One concentrator employed rotary vacuum drum filtration for solids removal and washing, the .other used counter current decantation in torque arm thickeners. Capital and operating costs, operation and maintenance, and metallurgical performance of the two solution recovery methods are compared and contrasted. A recent development, removal of the sand fraction ahead of C.C.D. and separate sand washing in hydraulic cyclones, is also discussed.
Citation

APA: K. D. Hester A. C. Anderson  (1973)  Filtration Vs Counter Current Decantation - A Comparison

MLA: K. D. Hester A. C. Anderson Filtration Vs Counter Current Decantation - A Comparison. The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1973.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account