Filtration Vs Counter Current Decantation - A Comparison

- Organization:
- The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
- Pages:
- 39
- File Size:
- 887 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 1973
Abstract
The Elliot Lake uranium deposits are contained in a pebble conglomerate which is similar throughout the basin. This paper compares the solid-liquid separation circuits of two nominal 3000 T/d acid leach uranium concentrates treating Elliot Lake ore. One concentrator employed rotary vacuum drum filtration for solids removal and washing, the .other used counter current decantation in torque arm thickeners. Capital and operating costs, operation and maintenance, and metallurgical performance of the two solution recovery methods are compared and contrasted. A recent development, removal of the sand fraction ahead of C.C.D. and separate sand washing in hydraulic cyclones, is also discussed.
Citation
APA:
(1973) Filtration Vs Counter Current Decantation - A ComparisonMLA: Filtration Vs Counter Current Decantation - A Comparison. The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1973.