Geologist's Gordian Knot: To Cut Or Not To Cut

Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
I. S. Parrish
Organization:
Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
Pages:
5
File Size:
959 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1997

Abstract

As noted by McKinstry (1948), "How to deal with erratic high samples is one of the knottiest problems in ore estimation." He described a variety of approaches and methods to alleviate the problem through the averaging and weighing of assay data and by "cutting" or "clipping" of the erratic assays. Bird (1991) elaborated on ways of dealing with the nugget effect (erratics). He listed several procedures for cutting. Bird's list has been reproduced and/or added to by several authors including Vallee (1992) and Stone and Dunn (1993). Missing from each of these otherwise excellent reviews is a definition, description or guideline to recognition of an "erratic," or just where or when cutting is warranted or justified.
Citation

APA: I. S. Parrish  (1997)  Geologist's Gordian Knot: To Cut Or Not To Cut

MLA: I. S. Parrish Geologist's Gordian Knot: To Cut Or Not To Cut. Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 1997.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account