Ground Support Observations at Xstrata?s Craig and Onaping Mines: Weak Links and Some Mine Design Solutions

- Organization:
- Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum
- Pages:
- 9
- File Size:
- 3079 KB
- Publication Date:
- Feb 1, 2008
Abstract
The theoretical capacity of various ground support components can be misleading, especially in bursting ground where the failure mode is often in the retainment system. Wire mesh screen seams often peel open rather than breaking the wire strands, fractured rock often un-ravels around the bolts rather than breaking the bars. If a weak link(s) in the system fails prematurely, then the potential capacity of the system may never be fully realized. Underground observations are used to show how some support systems behave in the field. Various combinations of wire mesh screen with friction bolts, rebar, modified conebolts, cablebolts, shotcrete and mechanical rockbolts are considered. A short case history is used to contrast the performance of ?just-intime? development in a high stress faulted area versus a tunnel subjected to multiple stress changes in a similar environment. The latter proved to be a serious ground support problem when the well developed fracture zone around the opening was subjected to dynamic loading from a large seismic event causing a severe rockburst. In such cases an improved mining strategy may be more relevant than higher capacity support systems.
Citation
APA:
(2008) Ground Support Observations at Xstrata?s Craig and Onaping Mines: Weak Links and Some Mine Design SolutionsMLA: Ground Support Observations at Xstrata?s Craig and Onaping Mines: Weak Links and Some Mine Design Solutions. Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum, 2008.