In-Situ Recovery Of Sandstone Uranium Deposits In New Mexico: Past, Present, And Future Issues And Potential - Preprint 09-016

Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
V. T. McLemore
Organization:
Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
Pages:
5
File Size:
158 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 2009

Abstract

In-situ leaching (ISL) operations have been proposed to recover uranium from sandstone-uranium deposits in NM. ISL (also known as in-situ recovery, solution mining, solution-leach mining, leach mining) consists of injecting a leaching solution into the mineralized zone through injection wells. The leach solution migrates through the formation, dissolves uranium and is recovered through production wells. The uranium is then precipitated through a conventional uranium recovery system. Several criteria must be met in order for in-situ leaching to be successful, most important is that the ore body must be amenable to chemical leaching. A number of ISL operations have been conducted in NM in the past (Mobil, Crownpoint; UNC-Teton, Section 23; Grace Nuclear, Hook?s Ranch, Seboyeta, Church Rock; Anaconda, Windwhip). Kerr-McGee (later Quivera Mining Co., Rio Algum) successfully produced uranium from mine-water recovery (recirculated mine water) from the Ambrosia Lake mines (mid-1960s to 2002). Despite some difficulties, ISL is a viable alternative to recovering uranium and could be utilized in the Grants district with proper aquifer characterization and monitoring.
Citation

APA: V. T. McLemore  (2009)  In-Situ Recovery Of Sandstone Uranium Deposits In New Mexico: Past, Present, And Future Issues And Potential - Preprint 09-016

MLA: V. T. McLemore In-Situ Recovery Of Sandstone Uranium Deposits In New Mexico: Past, Present, And Future Issues And Potential - Preprint 09-016. Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 2009.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account