Inflatable Rock Bolt Bond Strength vs. Rock Mass Rating (RMR): A Comparative Analysis of Pull–Out Testing Data from Underground Mines in Nevada

International Conference on Ground Control in Mining
Chase K. Barnard Rajagopala Kallu Sean Warren Rahul Thareja
Organization:
International Conference on Ground Control in Mining
Pages:
5
File Size:
858 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 2015

Abstract

"Inflatable rock bolts are commonly utilized for ground support in Nevada underground mines, however, there is limited information regarding what factors influence the bond strength of these bolts. Bond strength is an important parameter in friction bolt support design, and this information is usually not available from manufacturers as a standard. Previous research has investigated the bond strength of friction bolts; however, these studies focused primarily on split set bolts and ground conditions more favorable compared to those commonly encountered in Nevada underground mines. Without site-specific bolt pull-out tests, ground control engineers are required to make assumptions regarding the in-situ bond strength of rock bolts. This is especially a concern for projects in the feasibility and initial development stages before site-specific experience is acquired.The purpose of this paper is to establish confidence in anticipated minimum bond strength for inflatable rock bolts by comparing the bond strength to variable geotechnical conditions using the Rock Mass Rating (RMR) system. To investigate a correlation between these parameters, the minimum bond strength of pull-out tested inflatable rock bolts was compared to the RMR of the rock in which these bolts were placed. Bond strength vs. RMR plots indicate that expected minimum bond strength is positively correlated with RMR, however the correlation is not strong. Cumulative percent graphs indicate that 97% of pull-out tests result in a minimum bond strength of 1 ton/ft and ½ ton/ft in RMR =45 and <45, respectively.Although lower bond strengths are more commonly encountered in low RMR ground, high bond strengths are possible as well, yielding higher variability in bond strengths in low RMR ground. Bond strength of friction bolts relies on contact between the rock bolt and drill hole. Experience in Nevada indicates that RMR is known to affect both the quality and consistency of drill holes which likely affects bond strength. Drilling and bolting in low RMR ground is more sensitive to drilling and bolting practices, and strategies for maximizing bond strength in these conditions are discussed."
Citation

APA: Chase K. Barnard Rajagopala Kallu Sean Warren Rahul Thareja  (2015)  Inflatable Rock Bolt Bond Strength vs. Rock Mass Rating (RMR): A Comparative Analysis of Pull–Out Testing Data from Underground Mines in Nevada

MLA: Chase K. Barnard Rajagopala Kallu Sean Warren Rahul Thareja Inflatable Rock Bolt Bond Strength vs. Rock Mass Rating (RMR): A Comparative Analysis of Pull–Out Testing Data from Underground Mines in Nevada. International Conference on Ground Control in Mining, 2015.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account