Liquid Ion Exchange-Electrowinning Vs. Cementation: An Economic Analysis

The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
R. B. Sudderth
Organization:
The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Pages:
23
File Size:
634 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1974

Abstract

The recovery of copper by various combinations of processes centered around liquid ion exchange has certainly been accepted as a technically superior entity when compared to the widely applied classical method of cementation. While the technical aspect of liquid ion exchange processes has received much attention and acclaim through actual operating data, in particular the ease of handling solutions, percentage recovery, reduction of pollution, etc., the corresponding economic data has either gone unpublished or has been held confidential. Much of this economic data has now been made available for publication; and with this data, we at General Mills Chemicals, Inc., will attempt to present an accurate economic analysis of some liquid ion exchange plants and an economic comparison between these plants and the typical cementation facility.
Citation

APA: R. B. Sudderth  (1974)  Liquid Ion Exchange-Electrowinning Vs. Cementation: An Economic Analysis

MLA: R. B. Sudderth Liquid Ion Exchange-Electrowinning Vs. Cementation: An Economic Analysis. The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1974.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account