Merits Of Using Andalusite-Based Refractories Compared To Bauxite-Based Refractories
    
    - Organization:
 - The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
 - Pages:
 - 4
 - File Size:
 - 1109 KB
 - Publication Date:
 - Aug 1, 2013
 
Abstract
Historically bauxite-based refractories have been used in applications where andalusite-based refractories could work. Bauxite-based refractories were chosen over andalusite-based refractories mainly because of the availability of low-cost Chinese bauxite and also because many furnaces were designed by international companies that cannot easily access high-quality products. Currently, the availability of low-cost bauxite is under threat as a result of high export duties and tariffs as well as restrictions on the amount of material that China allows to be exported. South Africa is a major producer of andalusite, and this guarantees stability with respect to both availability and price. Refractories based on andalusite have an added economic advantage over bauxite-based refractories in that unlike bauxite, which requires high-temperature calcination before use, andalusite is used in its raw state. This paper constitutes a literature study of the merits, both technical and economic, of using refractories based on andalusite compared to bauxite-based refractories.   Keywords   bauxite, andalusite, refractory, furnaces, calcination.
Citation
APA: (2013) Merits Of Using Andalusite-Based Refractories Compared To Bauxite-Based Refractories
MLA: Merits Of Using Andalusite-Based Refractories Compared To Bauxite-Based Refractories. The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 2013.