Mineral Industry vs. Ecology - A Balance Between Development And Environmental Quality

The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Organization:
The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers
Pages:
10
File Size:
1162 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1971

Abstract

Polluted air and water, despoiled land and excessive noise are the unwelcome results of the population growth and a rising standard of living. The consumption of goods and services, including metal products and minerals, by all people is increasing so rapidly that civilization is in danger of destroying the environment in which it lives. This is true because every human activity affects the environment, whether it is air, water or land. While E. F. Osborn, director, U.S. Bureau of Mines, says . . . "some members of the mineral industry are reluctant to recognize environmental demands" . . . William T. Pecora Under Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior.. . says that, "to maintain levels of resource development and environmental quality needed to satisfy our affluence, we must trade off values rather than turn off troublesome operations." What it seems to boil down to is how much control of its operations is the mineral industry willing to accept-internal policing or strict government control? The answer lies in how well the mineral industry maintains a balance between mineral development and environmental quality.
Citation

APA:  (1971)  Mineral Industry vs. Ecology - A Balance Between Development And Environmental Quality

MLA: Mineral Industry vs. Ecology - A Balance Between Development And Environmental Quality. The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 1971.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account