Mining And Community Development: From Rethoric To Practice

- Organization:
- Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration
- Pages:
- 3
- File Size:
- 71 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 2012
Abstract
In recent times, with rare exceptions, most economically viable ore discoveries have been large, low-grade and located in remote parts of the world. Mining companies have often shown to be incapable of mitigating their social and economic impact on local communities. Sustainable development and relations can be achieved by implementing bottom-up methodologies to the top-down tools already in use by mining companies. In order to magnify the importance of enterprise facilitation as a primary method for community development, data from 25 years of community based work around the world was used. Results highlight the need for a grassroots approach to local economic and community development, which focuses on the creation of a parallel economy in communities. Using solely top-down methodologies for developing community relations is shown to be a limited resource for mining companies. There are fundamentally two dangers for mining companies: alienating the local population, resulting in militancy and lengthy legal battles to obtain a license to operate; and, being accountable for building social and economic infrastructure that are not the company?s responsibility.
Citation
APA:
(2012) Mining And Community Development: From Rethoric To PracticeMLA: Mining And Community Development: From Rethoric To Practice. Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 2012.