Note on Rittinger's Law of Grinding

If S (x) is the specific rate of breakage of size x and B (x, y) (see Table 1 for Nomenclature) is the cumulative breakage distribution function, the Herbst Fuerstenau2 assumption is that Inserting this assumption into first-order grinding equations it has been shown" that there are then simple analytical solutions to the grinding equations, as shown in Table 2. In this context "plug flow" is defined as all material passing through the mill in the same length of time, the residence time t. The term "n fully-mixed" means that the mill has a residence time distribution" which can be treated as if the mill were n equal fully mixed sections in series. In addition it has been shown that the assumption of Eq. 1 also leads to simple analytical solutions for closed-circuit, steady-state grinding with an ideal classifier at the mill exit returning oversize to the mill feed. The solutions are also given in Table 2, with µ as the ideal classifier cut size, C the circulation ratio, and Q (x) the size distribution of the circuit product. The specific surface area of these size distributions is where the density-shape factor k. is assumed to be constant with size. In practice, most methods of size analysis or area [ ] measurement have a finite lower limit, so that the integration is really performed from xm, to xm, For a realistic degree of grinding the value of So is dominated by the fine sizes because of the 1/x factor. Consider batch grinding of a feed of size y to y + dy. The batch grinding solution given in Table 2 is then [ ] The fresh surface area produced is the area of the fines plus the area of the original material remaining minus the area of the original material, [ ] Little error is introduced by neglecting the last term on the right-hand side since at t = 0 it is zero, and when t is significant the first term dominates because of the fine sizes produced. In addition, the form of P (x, t) for [ ] realistic values of S (x) 2t ax° is such that the major fraction of fresh surface produced is contained within the bottom 10% of weight of broken material, that is, for sizes for which P(x, t) < 0.1 (providing y is not near x.,). Thus for surface area purposes Eq. 3 can be approximated by [ ] becomes providing again that the feed sizes are coarse relative to xmi. Then the fresh area production is and W is the mass in the mill. The rate of surface production is WK, and the specific surface is Kt. From Table 2, the specific energy is mt/W so surface production per unit energy is [ ] Surface produced per unit energy input = KW/m (8) where m is the energy input of the mill. Clearly, identical reasoning applies to open-cycle, plug-flow grinding, with t replacing t, and Eq. 8 is obtained again. Considering open-cycle, fully mixed grinding, similar reasoning gives P(x) - t S(x) for surface area purposes, and