Part IV – April 1969 - Papers - The Variation with Composition of the Diffusivity of Carbon in Austenite

A model for interstitial solid solutions has been considered in which a repulsive Potential exists between interstitial atoms in the solvent lattice. It has been shown that this model is consistent with the thermodynamic Properties of certain interstitial solid solutions. The model is then applied to the calculation of the variation of the diffusivity of carbon in au-tenite with composition. Although the energy levels at the saddle point, and thus the absolute values of dif-fusivity, cannot be calculated, it is shown that by taking the repulsive interactions between the diffusing atoms into account the functional form of the dependence of diffusivity on solute concentration can be derived. ThE composition dependence of the diffusivity, D, of carbon in austenite at a given temperature is well-known.'-3 smith3 tried to reconcile the observed composition dependence of D at 1000°C with the previously observed4 composition dependence of carbon activity using equations for D derived by arken5 and Fisher, Hollomon, and Turnbull,6 but was unsuccessful. In this paper we shall modify the approach of Fisher et al. by considering the "blocking" model7 for interstitial solid solutions, based on concept due to Speiser and Spretnak,' in which a repulsive potential exists between interstitial solute atoms in the solvent lattice, causing a certain number of interstitial sites to be "blocked" from occupancy by further solute atoms. We shall thus be able to describe the intimate relationship between the composition dependence of carbon diffusivity, a kinetic phenomenon, and the composition dependence of carbon activity in austenite. THEORY Consider for convenience one-dimensional interstitial diffusion in an fcc lattice in the [loo] direction. Fig. 1. Assume that solute atoms occupy octahedral sites only.7,9'10 These octahedral sites are located on {lOO} planes a/2Å apart. A solute atom, A, occupying an octahedral site on a {100 } plane denoted by 2, has twelve nearest-neighbor octahedral sites: four on plane 1, four on plane 2, and four on plane 3. Diffusion occurs when there is a net flux of solute atoms, through an imaginary plane shown with dashed lines, from plane 2 to plane 3. Fisher et al6. use the concept of activated complexes, as given in the theory of absolute reaction rates." They show that the number of solute atoms per cubic centimeter per second which pc — Fig. 1-Diagram showing the arrangement of octahedral sites (x) in the fcc lattice. pass in the direction of diffusion from activated to new interstitial position is: ?where C is the concentration of the solute in atoms per cubic centimeter, l/m + is the fraction of new interstitial positions corresponding to motion in the forward diffusion direction (transmission coefficient), ?F* is the free-energy difference between the activated complex and the reactants when each is in its standard state at the temperature of the reaction (independent of temperature and composition in the case of carbon in austenite), y is the activity coefficient of the solute species, and, finally, ym is the activity coefficient of the activated complex (assumed constant). The flux of atoms moving in the forward direction through an area of 1 sq cm perpendicular to the direction of diffusion is therefore: m+ Ym l ' atoms per second where is the distance between planes. The blocking model states that a nearest-neighbor octahedral site of a given solute atom has a probability, f, of being inaccessible to other solute atoms. The number of available sites for diffusion on a given plane will, therefore, depend on f, which is constant, and Nu, the number of solute atoms on that plane. The effect is to have more available sites in the diffusion direction, thereby increasing the net flux of solute atoms. This is reflected in the transmission coefficient, l/m. To calculate the transmission coefficient for solute