Repeated Blasting: Fatigue Damaging or Not?

International Society of Explosives Engineers
Mark S. Stagg David E. Siskind
Organization:
International Society of Explosives Engineers
Pages:
13
File Size:
337 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1985

Abstract

The Bureau of Mines arranged to have a wood-frame test house built in the pat of an advancing surface coal nine so it could investigate the effects of repeated blasting on a residential house. Structural fatigue and damage were assessed over a 2-yr period. The house was subjected to vibrations from 587 production blasts with particle velocities that varied from 0.10 to 6.94 in/s. Later, the entire house was mechanically shaken to produce fatigue cracking. Failure strain characteristics of construction materials were evaluated as a basis for comparing strains induced by blasting and shaker loading to those induced by weather and household activities. Cosmetic or hairline cracks 0.01 to 0.10 mm wide occurred during construction of the house and also during periods when no blasts were detonated. The formation of cosmetic cracks increased from 0.3 to 1.0 cracks per week when ground motions exceeded 1.0 in/s. Human activity and changes in temperature and humidity caused strains in walls that were equivalent to those produced by ground motions up to 1.2 in/s. When the entire structure was mechanically shaken, the first wallboard tape joint crack appeared after 56,000 cycles, the equivalent of 28 yr of shaking by blast-generated ground motions of 0.5 in/s twice a day.
Citation

APA: Mark S. Stagg David E. Siskind  (1985)  Repeated Blasting: Fatigue Damaging or Not?

MLA: Mark S. Stagg David E. Siskind Repeated Blasting: Fatigue Damaging or Not?. International Society of Explosives Engineers, 1985.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account