RI 8924 - Comparative Laboratory Evaluation of Resin-Grouted Roof Bolt Elements

- Organization:
- The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
- Pages:
- 25
- File Size:
- 8575 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 1985
Abstract
In laboratory testing, the Bureau of Mines established criteria by which common resin-grouted roof bolting systems can be evaluated and compared. Ultimate strength and stiffness were determined for nonten-sioned full-column, point-anchor, tensioned full-column, and debondable resin-grouted bolts, and for variations on full-column boltsn Bolt per-formances were compared using the performance of the 3/4-in full-column resin-grouted bolt as the standard. New and innovative systems can also be qualitatively compared against this standard. Since the medium into which a resin-grouted bolt is installed is one of the most important parameters affecting bolt performance, various host mediums were used in the testing: sandstone, concrete, simulated coal, simulated shale, and plaster. Bolt performances expected in other mediums can be inferred from the response patterns obtained in these mediums. Results indicate several functional differences among bolt types. Where resistance to shear is important, point-anchor bolts may outperform nontensioned full-column bolts at a lower cost. In medium-to soft-strength rock, tensioned full-column bolts perform best. Also, varying the resin-steel ratio seems to have little effect on the properties of a full-column bolt, when proper resin mixing is ensured.
Citation
APA:
(1985) RI 8924 - Comparative Laboratory Evaluation of Resin-Grouted Roof Bolt ElementsMLA: RI 8924 - Comparative Laboratory Evaluation of Resin-Grouted Roof Bolt Elements. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 1985.