Selection of optimum ferronickel grade for smelting nickel laterites

- Organization:
- Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum
- Pages:
- 8
- File Size:
- 508 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 2008
Abstract
The nickel laterite industry is divided into two camps when it comes to the grade of the ferronickels produced. One group, led by Falcondo and Cerro Matoso, markets high-grade ferronickels in the range of 35 to 40% nickel, while another group, led by SLN and the Japanese smelters, favour lower grades in the range of 20 to 25%. Because the ores processed by these smelters vary widely in terms of nickel content and iron to nickel ratios, it is probably more accurate to classify these smelters in terms of their iron recovery: Falcondo and Cerro Matoso smelt at lower reduction potentials and thus recover only 15 to 30% of the iron in their ores, while SLN and the Japanese smelters are very reducing and recover 45 to 65% of their iron. Low reductions generally imply higher slag losses and lower nickel recoveries, but also lower power and reductant requirements; higher reductions, the reverse. The question is, therefore, whether an economically optimum ferronickel grade exists for processing any given ore. This paper proposes a methodology for determining this optimum grade and concludes that nickel laterite smelters should favour low reductions and production of high-grade ferronickels.
Citation
APA:
(2008) Selection of optimum ferronickel grade for smelting nickel lateritesMLA: Selection of optimum ferronickel grade for smelting nickel laterites. Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum, 2008.