Shape Charge Effectiveness

- Organization:
- International Society of Explosives Engineers
- Pages:
- 12
- File Size:
- 559 KB
- Publication Date:
- Jan 1, 2011
Abstract
This paper will discuss the most efficient and effective way to use shape charges when considering standoff distances and the amount of an explosive to be used. For each shape charge test that was performed, a one inch diameter copper liner of 90o was used. Different standoffs for each shape charge were tested to see which one would penetrate the deepest into rolled homogenous armor steel (RHC 44). It was determined that a standoff of three cone diameters provides the deepest penetration. In addition to testing for optimal standoff distances, the effects of overfilling as well as under filling a shape charge with explosive was tested against a shape charge with the bare minimum amount of explosive for correct detonation. These “fill” tests were all performed at a standoff of three cone diameters. Overfilling has little to no effect towards penetrating deeper into a target while under filling a shape charge has an effect of shorter penetration. C-4 explosive was the main explosive for all shape charges.
Citation
APA:
(2011) Shape Charge EffectivenessMLA: Shape Charge Effectiveness. International Society of Explosives Engineers, 2011.