The Function of Alumina in Slags (3a0c8c94-b421-4c91-9ecc-2821590ea5b4)

J. E. JOHNSON, JR., New York, N. Y. (communication to the Secretary*).-The discussion of Mr. Henrich's paper took place at a meeting from which I had the misfortune to be absent, and has just come to my attention. I do not wish to let the subject pass without contributing to it a little information which has come into my possession. In 1912, I published a brief note in the Transactions on The Effect of Alumina in Blast-Furnace Slags, giving in tabular form three typical slags used in iron blast-furnace practice, one of them the high alumina slag of, which Professor Richards speaks. That table is reproduced herewith. TABLE 1.-Composition of Slays. 1 3 3 4 5 6 7 CaO by Neutral Ratio Ratio Ratio Al2z03, SiO2, Differ- Substan- Cat Ca0 a A1203 Ratio Per Per ence, ces, CaO Cent. Cent. Per Per Al2O3 + Sioz Sit: SiO2 Cecil_ Cent. Virginia practice 6.5 36.0 54.0 3.5 1.27 1.6S 1.50 Lake-ore practice 13.5 33.0 50.0 3.5 1.08 1.92 1.51 Special experiment... 36.0 24.7 36.8 3.5 0.59 2.90 1.44 It supplies what seems to me convincing evidence that, for the purposes of the iron blast furnace, alumina can be regarded only as a neutral substance, dissolving in the slag and materially altering its viscosity, but not affecting its chemical activity. In subsequent experience with charcoal furnaces, I found the same rule to hold; that the chemical effect of alumina could be disregarded, providing the ratio of the lime and magnesia to the silica were kept constant. This is exactly the experience which Messrs. Dwight and Mathewson had in copper- and' lead-smelting furnaces. I have never seen any evidence or argument adequate to support the contention of Professor Richards-that the alumina acted as a base in the charcoal iron furnace and as an acid in the coke furnace, and that the function of alumina in iron-furnace slags is inherently different from that in copper- and lead-furnace slags-and I am compelled to differ absolutely with his conclusions in that respect.