Why is Fire Assay so Misunderstood?

The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society
Joel A. Huffinan
Organization:
The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society
Pages:
9
File Size:
309 KB
Publication Date:
Jan 1, 1999

Abstract

"This presentation is being given to better inform the audience of the dependability of precious metal analysis by fire assay. A brief explanation, however, of standard fire assay exploration procedures will be given. An overview of other types of analyses by fire assay will be discussed as well, and the operation of a modern day assay laboratory.IntroductionThe use of lead oxide for the fire assay process dates back to the finds in Troy II and the Cappadocian Tablets about 3,000 B.C. Some advances have been made in the basic procedures due to instrumentation and electronics, but the fusion and cupellation procedures used in fire assay remain much the same as during this period.In 1600 AD. Agricola was the first to take a scientific approach to fire assay recording methods and procedures used (Hillerbrand and Allen, 1905) [1]. Since this period, much of the recognized research into the analysis of ores and metals was carried out in the late 1800's and early 1900's prior to World War II, and again after the deregulation of precious metals. The renewed interest in precious metals mining and metallurgy are due much to advances in precious metals heap leaching in late 1970's."
Citation

APA: Joel A. Huffinan  (1999)  Why is Fire Assay so Misunderstood?

MLA: Joel A. Huffinan Why is Fire Assay so Misunderstood?. The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, 1999.

Export
Purchase this Article for $25.00

Create a Guest account to purchase this file
- or -
Log in to your existing Guest account