Search Documents

By Donelson A. Robertson

Proper coupling between the seismograph transducer and the surface is the most important aspect of seismograph monitoring but probably receives the least attention in many blasting situations. Without good coupling, particle velocity measurements may be higher than actual and frequencies may be lower. If the field data are inaccurate, sophisticated instrumentation and computer programs cannot correct the readings.

Jan 1, 1993

By Don Z. Painter, Gordon F. Revey

Frontier/Traylor Joint Venture is presently constructing a section of the Tri-County Metropolitan Transit District of Oregon's (TRI-MET) Westside Light Rail system. This new section will extend Portland's existing transit system to the western suburbs of Beaverton and Hillsboro. The drill-blast excavations at this project include 10,000 feet of 20 foot tunnel, 18 cross passages, three shafts, an underground railway station, and a U-wall open cut. From a blast designer's perspective, this job has been extremely challenging. Blast vibration is limited to 0.5 ips at 200 feet or at the nearest structure, and airblast is limited to 129 dB -- linear peak and 96 dB -- C scale. The tunnels pass under heavily built up areas and have top of tunnel to surface cover distances as low as 70 feet. Surface blasting in the 26,000 cubic yard U-wall excavation was limited to five short nighttime periods due to its proximity to the very busy highway 26.

Jan 1, 1995

By Virgil J. Stachura, Larry R. Fletcher

The Bureau of Mines conducted a series of delayed blasting experiments at a West Virginia contour coal mine which resulted in smoother highwalls. The highwalls were smoother due to reduced overbreak and inherently safer due to reduced likelihood of rockfall. Reduced overbreak was accomplished by an increase in the highwall hole delay intervals which changed the effective delay pattern geometry and the direction of burden movement. Three combinations of blast delay intervals in the highwall holes were tested: 1) 50 ms longer than the nominal design, 2) 50- and 100-ms longer delays in the nearest two rows that form the highwall, and 3) 100 ms longer than the nominal design. The mine's nominal blast design was a flat vee formed by 17-ms surface delays between holes and 42-ms surface delays between rows, with 200-ms in-the-hole delays. All three test designs produced highwall improvements over the nominal design with only occasional exceptions because of geologic variations.

Jan 1, 1985

By Richard B. O'Meara

"The demand by a customer to an Explosives supplier to fulfill a specialised productrequirement was met by a level headed decision to try to satisfy that demand. This paperwill describe the fundamental steps required in order to develop and produce a newexplosives device, while under certain resource constraints, such that the needs of thecustomer and the supplier are met safely and effectively."

Jan 1, 1993

By Robert F. Flagg

This paper reviews the state of the art of precision explosive demolition particularly as it pertains to steel bridges. The two key factors affecting the acceptance of this type of demolition/are discussed as well as the physics and performance of the key explosive tool, the linear shaped charge. Methods of planning and executing typical bridge demolitions are discussed and examples of noteworthy engineering tasks given.

Jan 1, 1976

By Q Liu, P D. Katsabanis

The energy output of crushed AN/FO, crushed AN/FO mixed with Aluminum (5%, 6.4% and 9.4% A1 by mass) and a commercial emulsion explosive has been measured using a detonation calorimeter. The charges had a diameter of 10 mm and were heavily confined by a 11 mm thick copper shell. In order to achieve stable detonation glass microballoons were used in the explosives so that the density of the AN/FO charges would be around 1.1 g/cc. The charges were detonated in vacuum and the detonation products were analyzed using gas chromatography. It was found that energy values were very close to calculated values obtained by ideal detonation codes.

Jan 1, 1993

By K R. Sharpe, A Davitt

CXA is currently evaluating, in co-operation with Inco Metals, a new idea in small diameter hole blasting - the Unidelay Nonel initiation system. In concept, the Unidelay system is a hybrid of the conventional multi-period Nonel system and the safety fuse assembly/igniter cord system. It combines the operational advantages of the latter, simplicity and flexibility, with those of the former, safety and compatibility with all commercial explosives.

Jan 1, 1982

By Doug Johnson

This paper reviews the field implementation of R & F Coal's blasting optimization work concerning analysis, prediction, and control of overburden blasting vibrations using site specific measurements and state-of-the-art computer technology. Blasting personnel at R & F Coal had the opportunity to work jointly with Otto Crenwelge of Shell Development Company in his test studies and to later be instructed in the procedures involved in optimizing vibration frequency.

Jan 1, 1988

By Tom Goforth, Rongmao Zhou

The interest of seismologists in mining explosions has increased substantially with the construction of the International Monitoring System (IMS). The IMS supports the Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban Treaty by providing global data coverage from seismic, hydro acoustic, infrasonic, and radionuclide sensors that will detect a host of natural and man-made events at regional (<2000 km) distances. Ideally, the recorded data can be used to identify those events that have explosive characteristics and therefore might be clandestine nuclear tests. The regional observations assure the detection of mining explosions, and these must be properly identified to avoid false alarms of the monitoring system. Cooperation with the mining industry, including documentation of the firing programs, provides critical information necessary to characterize the seismograms.

Jan 1, 2006

By Adrian J. Moore, Alan B. Richards, Rob Evans

Air and ground vibration from blasting is influenced by the delay pattern that is used. Wavefronts from blastholes fired in a blasting pattern can combine in certain circumstances to give increased blast vibration levels. A simple computer model has been developed which shows the combined effect of wavefronts from a multi-hole blast and identifies if wavefront reinforcement occurs, and permits delay patterns to be designed which will avoid or reduce wavefront reinforcement.

Jan 1, 1994

By Chad Ducey

The proper utilization of energy in an explosive column is of paramount importance to the success of any blast. Historically, Powder Factor (the weight of explosive per mass or volume of material to be blasted or its inverse), has dictated the blast design. The concept of Energy Factor is a more effective method to design a blast. In order to utilize explosives efficiently, the energy contained in any given product must be quantified. The Powder Factor method, although historically successful, assumes that a pound of cast pentolite affects the material to be blasted the same as a pound of ammonium nitrate / me1 oil (ANFO.) Years of experience and scientific testing have led the blaster in the field to believe otherwise. The next logical technological step is Energy Factor. The Energy Factor method that will be discussed in this paper takes into consideration not only the weight of the explosive, but also the weight strength (Cal/g) and the density (g/cc) to yield a constant relative Energy Factor. The result of such a method is a factor that can be used in the field exactly the same as Powder Factor, but that reflects the relative energy of any given product in terms that will reflect the relative cost benefit of that explosive selection. The Energy Factors associated with different available explosives make it possible to compare the difference in the amount of energy per loaded pound in each unit length of borehole. This paper will examine the concept of Energy Factor in an in depth manner and also compare this quantification method to that of Powder Factor. It will also demonstrate the value of using Energy Factor and how it can improve the efficiency of a blast design. The misconceptions that come along with using Powder Factor will be examined and comparisons will be made between boreholes loaded using Powder Factor and those that are loaded using Energy Factor. This paper will clearly define the differences between these blast design methods and allow the reader to realize the production, quality, and economic advantages of using the Energy Factor method.

Jan 1, 2000

By Alan R. Cameron, Alastair C. Torrance

An explosives underwater test facility has been established and commissioned in the Hunter Valley, New South Wales, Australia which allows the measurement of the actual shock and gas energies of the explosive

Jan 1, 1990

By Neil E. Gehrig

The word "slurry" was used by Dr. Melvin Cook and Mr. Henry Farnam to describe a new blasting agent developed in 1956. This development, along with the development of ANFO triggered the Modern Era of Blasting. We have seen the results, a massive expansion in the commercial explosives industry. Someone once said, "You can't know where you're going if you don't know where you've been." With that in mind, this paper deals to some extent with the origin and development of slurry explosives and then with their future high potential.

Jan 1, 1982

By Charles E. Joachim, Christo V. Lunderman, Charles R. Wdch

The U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station (WES) recently conducted a series of precision-scale water shock experiments which consisted of the detonation of several 8-gram, 10-gram, and 12-gram spherical explosive charges. The charges were fabricated from NAX 2000 Primasheet explosive and were center-detonated. Commercial tourmaline crystal water shock sensors were used to measure the induced pressure fields in the water. The measured water shock waveforms and related parameters from the precision-scale experiments were in general agreement with data from larger-scale experiments.

Jan 1, 1998

By Eric Grigoryan, Wade Hutchison

An engineering study of 2,250 blasting damage claims from 1999 to 2008 in Tennessee, Kentucky, Virginia, Nevada, California, Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, Alabama, Arizona and Utah were investigated over the last decade and these investigations determine that blasting ground vibrations damage claims are valid less than 1.3 percent of the time. This study determined that valid blasting damage occurred as a result of impact damage associated with fly rock, air concussion stressing, instantaneous reverse stressing associated with ground vibration and crater zone soil shifting related stressing.

Jan 1, 2009

By Gungor Tuncer, Ali Kahriman

"In bench blast design, not only the technical and economical aspects, such as block size, uniformityand cost, but also the elimination of environmental problems resulting from ground vibration and airblast should be taken into consideration."

Jan 1, 1999

By Douglas R. Burns

During the summer of 1989, Maine Drilling and Blasting of Gardiner, Maine was contracted by Cayer Corporation of Harvard, Massachusetts to drill and blast an interceptor trench at the Nyanza Chemical Superfund Site in Ashland, Massachusetts.

Jan 1, 1991

By James T. Ludwiczak

The state of Kentucky uses more explosives than any other state in the country. The majority of these explosives are used in underground and strip mines in the well-known coal fields of eastern and western Kentucky.

Jan 1, 1978

By Deane Tunaley, Paul Tidman, Qian Liu, John Mullay

Laboratory studies have indicated that the crystallization and desensitization of microballoon sensitized emulsion explosives start immediately after shocking or pre-compression. However, the question of whether or not the shocked emulsion could be worsened by the growth of crystallization or recovered by rebounding back to lower densities has been rarely examined under actual rock blasting conditions. This study was primarily intended to investigate the desensitization characteristics of two commonly used emulsion products in terms of blasthole spacing and delay duration. In the experiment, two parallel blastholes, 32 mm in diameter and 1.7 m deep, were drilled downwards in an underground drift.

Jan 1, 1995

By Christopher Smith

The critical nature of detonator function in blast design and its effects upon performance and safety of a blasting operation are well documented. Numerous laboratory and field studies have shown dynamic shock waves, generated by the detonating explosives in a shot, to be detrimental to the performance of the explosive columns in the adjacent boreholes. Laboratory tests conducted in Japan have explored the possible effects of dynamic precompression upon cartridges of emulsion explosives, which had been sensitized with different hotspot void producing methods. These tests uncovered significant differences in the magnitude of the dynamic shock wave pressures measured inside the different emulsion explosive cartridges, and demonstrated these pressure differences by crushing detonator shells inserted inside the emulsion cartridge. Basically, the results of these tests clearly showed the magnitude of the compressive force applied to the detonator inside the primed explosive cartridge to be a function of the mechanism that had been used to sensitize the emulsion (i.e., glass microspheres, plastic spheres, chemical gassing). The current study was designed to further explore the actual detonator failure mechanism in these dynamic precompression tests using live detonators inside the emulsion cartridge as opposed to empty detonator shells. The testing involved inserting commercial delay detonators inside emulsion charges, which had been sensitized with common hotspot void producing agents, and subjecting the primed explosive cartridge to the dynamic pressure wave generated by an underwater donor explosive charge. The effects of variations in the emulsion’s sensitization method upon the damage inflicted to the detonator were studied. Depending upon the degree of detonator damage, detonator crushing can lead to varying degrees of detonator malfunctions, ranging from sympathetic initiation of the detonator, to a reduction in delay time accuracy, to reduced detonator output, to complete detonator failure. Each of these malfunctions can have serious detrimental effects upon the performance and safety of a blasting operation.

Jan 1, 2006