Search Documents

Jan 1, 1951

Jan 1, 1952

Jan 1, 1929

Jan 1, 1964

Jan 1, 1967

Jan 1, 1929

Jan 1, 1909

Jan 1, 1944

Jan 1, 1938

Jan 1, 1963

Jan 1, 1918

[Page Officers of the Institute 5 Minutes of. Twentieth Meeting 9 "Cutter Bits"-J. H. Emrick 12 Discussion 16 Experiments in Roof Control-D. A. Stout 18 Discussion 28 Use of Permissible Powder in Coal Mining-H. Petersen 35 Discussion 38 Safety Measures-F. C. Miller 40 Automatic Mine Fan Signal-O. C.. Irwin 45 Discussion 46 The Operation of Gaseous Mines-Samuel Tescber 51 Discussion 55 "The Alamo Mine"-E. H. McCleary 60 Discussion 69 Mudite Discussion 71 The Mudite Machine-Ogden Iron Works Co 73 Reducing the Labor Turn-Over-Eugene McAuliffe 79 Coal vs. Oil Competition-Franklin P. Wood and Eugene Weber 81 Miscellaneous Discussion 86 New General Coal Mine Safety Orders of the State of Utah-B. W. Dyer 90 Discussion 93 Wednesday Afternoon Session 103 Comment on Utah Mining Law-Wm.Monay 104]

Jan 1, 1925

Jan 1, 1919

Jan 1, 1881

Jan 1, 1903

Jan 1, 1902

[Page Officers of the Institute 5 Minutes of Nineteenth Meeting 9 Coal Mine Explosions-William -Moorhead 11 "What Do You Mean-`Coal Dust'?"--K. L. Marshall 16 Discussion of Foregoing Papers 17 Shale Dusting-J. A. Smith 21 Discussion 25 Conditions That Make Coal Dust Explosive-T. T. Read 25 General Discussion 27 1-Mechanical Loading Review-Chas. Gottschalk 30 Mechanical Loading in Coal Mines-S. W. Farnham 34 Mechanical Loading Practice at Hanna, Wyo.-T. H. Butler 48 Guessing or Knowing! Which?-Eugene McAuliffe 52 Discussion of Loading Papers 54 Bumps or Squeezed Conditions in Coal Mines-Geo. A. Brown 59 Vertical Cutting-Thos. A. Stroup 62 Mine Fires-Thos. A. Foster 71 Membership List 74]

Jan 1, 1924

Jan 1, 1895

The following discussion occurred on the afternoon of Sept,. 22, 1930, as part of the fall meeting of the Iron and Steel Division at Chicago. About seventy-five men attended this session. C. B. Murray opened the meeting, as follows: C. B. Murray, Cleveland, Ohio.—It is very encouraging to see so many here this afternoon to discuss this important matter of beneficiation. The producers of ore, I am sure, are anxious to furnish the grade of ore that the consumer wants. The consumer sometimes wants that which cannot be economically produced and often the producer cannot understand why the consumer wants certain things. It was to bring together these two interested parties that this meeting was proposed. I was appointed the chairman of the meeting, chiefly because I happened to be the chairman of the Iron Ore Committee of the Institute. I know a little about iron ore but have not perhaps kept up with the times in blast-furnace practice. I am asking Mr. Sweetser, who is well informed from both sides, to take over the meeting and carry on the discussion. R. H. Sweetser, Columbus, Ohio.—We want to have a free discussion between the iron-ore men and the blast-furnace men as to just what we are trying to reach in the beneficiation of iron ores. Many of those present have had a great deal of experience. There are men here from the ranges who have been passing through the experimental stage of beneficiation of iron ores, and there are some who have already gone on to commercial production. We have reached the point where the beneficiation of iron ore is important to the whole iron and steel industry. The connection between iron-ore beneficiation and the cleaning of coal is so close that I think we can profit by working very close to the coal people. Some Aspects of the Iron-ore Situation W. G. Swart, Babbitt, Minn.—I was very much interested in Mr. Richards'* paper on tonnages and the 20-year life. There is one interesting thing about the ore reserves; that is, the irregular distribution of that tonnage. On the Mesabi Range, for example, the United States Steel Corpn. owns between 70 and 75 per cent. of the reserve tonnage. They ship bctween 40 and 50 per cent. of the annual Lake Superior

Jan 1, 1930

Jan 1, 1959