Search Documents

Executive BENJAMIN B. THAYER, .Chairman. JAMES F. KEMP, CHARLES F. RAND, ALBERT R. LEDOUX, JOSEPH W. RICHARDS, Membership KARL EILERS, Chairman. W. R. INGALLS, JOHN H. JANEWAY, Jr., JOHN D. IRVING, SIDNEY J. JENNINGS. Finance CHARLES F. RAND, Chairman. KARL EILERS. W. L. SAUNDERS.

Jan 1, 1917

FINANCE COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Erie V. Daveler, Chairman A B. Kinzel Gail F. Moulton INVESTMENTS ErIe V. Daveler, Chairman W L. Kleitz, '52 Henry Krumb, '53 Joseph E. Pogue, '51

Jan 1, 1952

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS W M Peirce, Chairman Philip Kraft, Vice-Chairman Francis B Foley Hjalmar W Johnson Thomas G Moore ENDOWMENT Cleveland E Dodge, Chairman C F Kelley John D Bradley Harvey S Mudd J Coulter W A Sinsheimer N Eavenson Wilfred Sykes C Jackling Clyde E Weed

Jan 1, 1951

Executive Committee, Board of Directors H D Smith, Chairman, C E Reistle, Jr, Vice-Chairman, T B Counselman, J S Smart, Jr, L F Remartz Finance Committee, Board of Directors A B Kinzel, Chairman, Philip Kraft, P D Wilson Investments Erle V Daveler, '57, Chairman, Henry Krumb, '56, Andrew Fletcher, '58, G F Moulton, ex officio as Treasurer, A B KInzel, ex officio as chairman of the Finance Committee Endowment W W Mein, Jr, Chairman, D H McLaughlin, J V N Dorr, J B Haffner, J R Suman, Henry Krumb, E V Daveler, D C Jackling, Wilfred Sykes, N G Alford, W J Coulter, C E Weed, 0 H Johnson, L F Reinartz, J B Morrow, R McMillan Endowment Fund "X" G F Moulton, Chairman (RIME Treasurer), Erle V Daveler, '58, G I Brigden, '57, Philip Kraft, '56

Jan 1, 1955

Executive Committee, Board of Directors Howard C Pyle, Chairman, J L Gillson, Vice¬Chairman, A W Thornton, Elmer A Jones, Augustus B Kinzel Finance Committee, Board of Directors J S Vanick, Chairman, John P Hammond, J W Woomer Investments Gail F Moulton, '60, Chairman, Andrew Fletcher, '62, John M Lovejoy, '61, C R Dodson, ex off as AIME Treasurer, J S Vanick, ex off as Chairman of Finance Committee Endowment Andrew Fletcher, Chairman, N G Alford, W J Coulter, Harold Decker, J V N Dorr, R B Gilmore, J B Haffner, Kenneth Hill, 0 H Johnson, J D MacKenzie, D H McLaughlin, J R McMillan, W S Morris, L F Reinartz, H DeWitt Smith, Wilfred Sykes, J R Suman, C E Weed Honorary Memberships C E Reistle, Jr, '60, Chairman, Grover J Holt, '61, Augustus B Kmzel, '62, (ex off as Past Presidents of AIME) M L Haider, '60, D H McLaughlin, '61, John M Lovejoy, '62, L F Reinartz, '63, Howard C Pyle, ex off as President of AIME

Jan 1, 1959

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS W E WRATHER, Chairman A B KINZEL -EARLE E SCHUMACHER DONALD H MCLAUGHLIN - JOHN R SUMAN FINANCE COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ERLE V DAVELER, Chairman PHILIP KRAFT - CLYDE E WEED

Jan 1, 1952

Executive Joseph L Gillson, Chairman, J W Woomer, Vice-Chatrman, John S Bell, Walter R Hibbard, Jr. R R McNaughton Finance John P Hammond, Chairman, James C Gray, J S Smart, Jr Investments Gall F Moulton, '63, Chairman, Andrew Fletcher, '62, John M Lovejoy, '61, George I Brigden, ex off as AIME Treasurer, John P Hammond, ex off as Chairman, AIME Finance Committee Award Committees Grouped together at end of list Cooperation with the Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and the Mining Society of Nova Scotia R R McNaughton, Chairman, C Gerow, Sherwin Kelly

Jan 1, 1960

[Executive E. DEGOLYER, Chairman SYDNEY H. BALL WILLIAM H. Bassett RICHARD PETERS, JR. J. V. W. REYNDERS Finance GEORGE D. BARRON, Chairman H. A. GUESS GEORGE OTIS SMITH]

Jan 1, 1928

Executive. CHARLES F. BAND, Chairman. JAMES F. KEMP, JOSEPH W. RICHARDS, ALBERT R. LEDOUX, BENJAMIN B. THAYER. Membership. BENJAMIN B. THAYER, Chairman. WALTER R. INGALLS, JOHN H. JANEWAY, JR., JOHN D. IRVING, HERMAN A. PROSSER. Finance. EDWARD L. YOUNG, Chairman. KARL EILERS, JAMES GAYLEY. Library. JAMES F. KEMP, Chairman 1 JOHN HAYS HAMMOND,3; E. GYBBON SPILSBURY,2 ALEX. C. HUMPHREYS,4 BRADLEY STOUGHTON.

Jan 5, 1913

Executive.. CHARLES F. RAND, Chairman. JAMES F. KEMP, JOSEPH W. RICHARDS. ALBERT R. LEDOUX, BENJAMIN B. THAYER. Membership. BENJAMIN B. THAYER, Chairman. WALTER R. INGALLS, JOHN H. JANEWAY, Jr., JOHN D. IRVING, HERMAN A. PROSSER. Finance. EDWARD L, YOUNG, Chairman. KARL EILERS, JAMES GAYLEY. Library. JAMES F. KEMP, Chairman. JOHN HAYS HAMMOND,3 E. GYBBON SPILSBURY,2 ALES. C. HUMPHREYS 4 BRADLEY STOUGHTON.

Jan 7, 1913

By Stephen C. Tadolini, Thomas M. Barczak

Western mines have had limited choices for standing support. Wood cribs were often too soft and unstable. The introduction of the Can support in the early 1990’s provided a very effective alternative and remains the dominant form of tailgate support. Water-filled prestressing cells are now used to cap the Can and preload it to provide an active roof load. The Cluster Prop, consisting of three timber wedge props bundled together, provides more capacity than an equivalent sized Can support and improves transport efficiency. However, the Cluster Prop is less stable and does not maintain a consistent load throughout its loading profile. Pumpable roof supports are another alternative support, but they have not been proven in high deformation environments. Alternative supports are also being used in longwall recovery operations. These include the Rocprop and Omni Prop, which are extendable support systems. They also provide active roof loading which can be beneficial in these applications. Specialty supports, such as the Sand Prop and Spider Prop, have also been introduced into western longwall operations. This paper compares the performance characteristics of these various support systems.

By Stephen C. Tadolini, Thomas M. Barczak

Western mines have had limited choices for standing support. Wood cribs were often too soft and unstable. The introduction of the Can support in the early 1990’s provided a very effective alternative and remains the dominant form of tailgate support. Water-filled prestressing cells are now used to cap the Can and preload it to provide an active roof load. The Cluster Prop, consisting of three timber wedge props bundled together, provides more capacity than an equivalent sized Can support and improves transport efficiency. However, the Cluster Prop is less stable and does not maintain a consistent load throughout its loading profile. Pumpable roof supports are another alternative support, but they have not been proven in high deformation environments. Alternative supports are also being used in longwall recovery operations. These include the Rocprop and Omni Prop, which are extendable support systems. They also provide active roof loading which can be beneficial in these applications. Specialty supports, such as the Sand Prop and Spider Prop, have also been introduced into western longwall operations. This paper compares the performance characteristics of these various support systems.

Jan 1, 2005

By S. C. Tadolini, T. M. Barczark

Mines in the western United States have had limited choices for standing support. Wood cribs were often too soft and unstable. The introduction of the Can support in the earl v 1990s provided an effective alternative, (lilt/ it remains the dominant form of tail¬gate support. Water-filled prestressing cells are now used to cap the Can and preload it to provide an active roof load. The Cluster Prop, consisting of three timber wedge props bundled to¬gether; provides more capacity than (m equivalent sized Call support and improves transport efficiency. However the Cluster Prop is less stable and does not maintain a consistent load throughout its loading profile. Pumpable roof supports are another alternative support, but the \' have not been proven in high deformation en¬vironments. This paper compares the performance characteristics o f these various support systems.

By J. Dubbert, T. H. Jones

"This paper describes a rib-control methodology that uses standing support to provide most of the lateral resistance to the rib. The method is analyzed, and its boundary conditions for rib control are described. In this method, an animal-fencing mesh product covers 80 percent of the rib surface and is sparsely bolted to the rib. Can supports or other similar stiff supports are installed primarily as roof support for the entry. As the rib spalls and dilates, the mesh catches the material and expands, pressing against the standing support. Mining proceeds, and vertical roof loads increase the normal force on the Can supports, causing friction at the top and bottom of the support to go up, thereby improving lateral resistance to rib swelling.At one mine in the western United States, this method has proved excellent at preventing the buildup of rib spall. It substantially reduces the number of bolts used for screen installation, improves installation efficiency, reduces manual labor and provides more rib coverage than many screening methods. Because standing support is typically part of the roof-control plan in longwall tailgates, no additional standing-support costs are incurred. IntroductionRib safety in underground coal mines is an oft-studied topic because ribs are high-hazard areas. An overview of early rib safety research can be found in Jones and Mohammed (2014). There is a significant difference between rib support and rib control. Support improves safety through the installation of strengthening elements, such as bolts and dowels, designed to reduce rib spalling. Although spall reduction is preferred, controlling how the rib fails is enough to ensure safety in some situations. Rib control uses external elements to provide confinement, thereby holding sloughed material in place, or to prevent falling rib material from striking mine personnel. This paper presents a study of a control method used on the pillar side of a longwall coal mine tailgate in the western United States."

Jan 1, 2015

By Heiner J. Sander

Stanford University operates the National Research Facility which is located at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC) in Menlo Park, California. In order to improve and allow for enhanced experiments, the current facilities required expansion. A1500 foot long tunnel (20 ft wide by 21 ft high) and a 220 foot long underground cavern (49 ft wide by 32 ft high) were excavated through the Ladera Sandstone formation which is an intermediate geo-material with week rock properties. The overburden between surface and crown of the structures varies from 10 to 80 feet. The underground structures were excavated according to the principles of the NATM (New Austrian Tunnel Method). This paper addresses the challenges that were encountered during the construction phase of the project and how construction issues were resolved mutually by the owner, engineer and contractor. The implementation of geotechnical instrumentation, recorded data and interpretations, soil conditions and behavior encountered during construction are also presented.

Jan 1, 2008

Ore from the "Staimite" lode in the Oonah mine, Zeehan, has a complex composition and contains an exceptional number of elements. Its chemical composition has been indicated by the following published figuresà

Jan 1, 1931

By Chester Purington

THE AUTHOR hopes that this paper will meet with criticism and debate by fellow members of the Institute rather than with that attitude of passiv-ity and indifference which one is inclined to adopt when considering a field completely foreign to one's own experi-ence. After several years of study of voluminous literature, maps, and statistics, and many personal journeys and field inspections of various parts of Siberia, the conclusion is reached .that the area adjacent to the Stanovoi, Zhugd-Zhur, and Yablonoi ranges as below defined is that which .is most accessible to the western world and will soonest give results from exploration. HISTORY The first incursion of the Russians into Siberia east of the Yenesei River appears to have been in 1632 when the fort of Yakutsk was founded on the middle Lena. The early expeditions were in quest of furs. As the Siberians say, "the sable beckoned" and the post of Anadyr was founded in 1639, two thousand miles further northeast. Thus nineteen years after the Pilgrims landed in Massachusetts, the Russians had established a trading post within 700 miles of what is now the town of Nome, Alaska. Parties of Cossaks penetrated to the shores of the Okotsk1 Sea early in the seventeenth century, but it was not until 1688 that the town of Okotsk was founded. In 1712 a grand project was elaborated at St. Petersburg for building a port at Okotsk, but it came to nothing. Vitus Bering, the Alaska explorer, built ships at Okotsk, and made this his point of depar-ture. It is stated that the iron work used in these ships was brought overland partly from Yakutsk, and partly even from St. Petersburg, 5500 miles away. Accord-ing to report a copper deposit was worked on the river Urak, not far from the coast, and copper was smelted for sheathing the bottoms. Grassgrown mounds con-taining slag and shots of copper were inspected by the writer last summer, at the site of the ancient shipyard.

Jan 11, 1923

By S. R. B. Cooke, R. O. Huch, C. S. Chang

IN the flotation of iron ores laurylamine derivatives have been used for considerable time.12 To effect satisfactory separation of the gangue, predominantly silica, from the iron oxide minerals, the addition of specific depressants for the iron oxides has been found necessary. Starches and starch products have been used for this purpose. 3 There is, however, very little published information on the effects of these materials and other variables on this process. In some cases it has been found that prior acid scrubbing and desliming are essential, 4 and depending upon the efficiency of the subsequent washing step, there will be accompanying changes in pH. It was the object of this investigation to test and observe the effects of the above factor as well as to examine and compare the action of various starches and starch products.

Jan 12, 1953

By Claudio Olalla

This paper relates to the foundation of a steel structure located at the San Martin de la Vega (Madrid) amusement park. The structure has more than 100 supports with various loading conditions, including important horizontal and uplift forces. Additionally, the settlement tolerances are very strict. A massive gypsum formation with interbedded clay layers and random solution great voids at various levels constitute the soil. The foundation design has been conditioned large enough these difficulties (load conditions and soil problems). The piling machine used was powerful to drill through the soft rock (UCS up to 11Mpa). The integrity of each pile had to be guaranteed by continuous recording of drilling and concrete pouring parameters. In order to fulfil all those conditions, a STARSOL type-piling rig was used. More than 4500 meters of piles were performed. The diameters of the piles were 450 and 550-mm and their depths varies from 6 to 23 meters. All piles were reinforced over their full length.

Jan 1, 2002

By J. Frostiak

The Campbell gold operation of Placer Dome Inc. produces an arsenopyrite-sulphide concentrate which must be treated either by roasting, biooxidation or by pressure oxidation to obtain high gold recoveries. Pressure oxidation is a proven process and has the inherent advantage of meeting the stringent environmental regulations in the province of Ontario. A comparison of biooxidation and pressure oxidation was completed early in 1990 and the latter was selected by Placer Dome as the preferred process for replacement of the roasters. The commercial plant design was based on technology supplied by Sherritt Gordon and in July of 1991, the existing roaster operation was shut down and a new pressure oxidation plant was commissioned. The following summary describes the start up of the new facility and presents typical operating data.

Jan 1, 1992