Search Documents

By Phil N. Bradbury

"During a routine belt tightening of all cost centers, the management at the Martin County Coal Surface Mines, located in Martin County Kentucky felt that a thorough investigation of the drilling and blasting program could possibly pinpoint areas where the cost could be cut without sacrificing production. Upon close inspection of the drill benches it was noted that the actual layout of burden,spacing and stemming varied a bit from the actual blast design that the management had outlined for the blasters. This paper will outline the method of reducing the drilling and blasting cost at the Martin County Coal Operation."

Jan 1, 1986

By J R. "Dick" Daniel

In the fall of 1988, The Cannon mine decided to investigate a central blasting system based on conventional electric blasting detonators being used to initiate rounds primed with Nonel detonators. The advantages of this hybrid detonator system were viewed as being safety and cost effectiveness. A study was done reviewing the safety aspects of utilizing a permanent blasting line installed throughout the main haulage drifts to a central blasting station located at the mine portal. The study addressed the following potential safety hazards: radio frequency induced current, stray current from both electrical utilities and transmission lines, galvanic and electrostatic sources of extraneous current.

Jan 1, 1989

By Curtis G. Kremer, Jeffrey L. Brummert

Blue Circle Cement's Ravena, New York quarry mines approximately 6.7 million tons of limestone per year. Blasting occurs approximately twice a week on three separate benches. Shots average 60,000 tons but can range up to 140,000 tons. Ongoing scrutiny of the drilling and blasting program allows for maximum blast efficiency which results in lower overall mining and crushing costs. Close cooperation between management and explosives supplier assures Blue Circle Cement's objective, "To develop, implement, and continuously improve a measurable drilling and blasting system that will optimize the total mining and crushing costs while ensuring compliance to safety and maintaining or reducing the environmental impacts of blasting".

Jan 1, 1994

Introduce self – thanks for having me.Indiana program – spent first 15 years of program telling folks how smart we are and to trust us. “We are from the government and we are here to help you.” How well would that go over with you if the IRS invited you in for an audit and that was their openning? Our audience was the same way – not thrilled or inspired. We decided we were the problem – being nice guys just was not enough. We had to learn to communicate with people who did not know us. I am here to share a few things we have learned – and are still learning.

Jan 1, 2007

By John R. Coulson

A survey of federal and state licensing requirements for blasters employed on the surface and underground was conducted for the Bureau of Mines. Subdivisions include surface and underground (large and small), metal, nonmetal and coal. The requirements for certification, class of license, available training, types of testing and enforcement practices are discussed. Included are recommendations of some of the industry trade organizations.

Jan 1, 1980

By Charles H. Dowding, Catherine T. Aimone

Rock particle sizes were measured at fourteen steep-slope Appalachian coal mines during production blasting. The distribution of rock sizes shows the effects of inter-hole timing, sequence of hole initiation, as well as charge distribution within each shot. Blast design parameters were selected to: (1) minimize displacement of broken rock conforming to throw control required of mining methods, (2) minimize seismic effects, and (3) create breakage at a cost economical to mining operations.

Jan 1, 1983